When considering breast augmentation, one key decision involves the type of incision used for placing the implants. Different incision types can impact various aspects of your surgical experience and outcomes, including recovery time, scar visibility, and even the final appearance of the breasts. Understanding these different approaches can provide you with the information needed to make a choice that aligns with your aesthetic goals and lifestyle. Board certified plastic surgeon M. Jason Hancey, MD provides breast augmentation to patients in Sandy, UT and surrounding areas.

There are several common incision options for breast augmentation: the inframammary approach, the periareolar technique, and the transaxillary method. Each has its unique advantages and potential drawbacks, and the right choice will depend on your individual circumstances, such as your body type, skin quality, and the type of implants being used.

The inframammary approach involves an incision in the crease under the breast, allowing for direct access to the breast tissue and typically resulting in well-hidden scars. The periareolar technique places the incision around the edge of the areola, which can minimize visible scarring but might impact nipple sensation or breastfeeding. Lastly, the transaxillary method uses an incision in the armpit, avoiding scars on the breast but requiring specialized surgical skills.

Discussing your options with your surgeon is essential to determine which incision type is best suited for you. Your surgeon will consider factors such as the size and type of implants, your anatomy, and your personal preferences to guide you in making an informed decision.

Inframammary Approach

The inframammary approach is a popular method where the incision is made in the crease under the breast, allowing the surgeon direct access to the breast tissue for precise implant placement. This technique is especially versatile, accommodating a wide range of implant sizes and types, which offers flexibility in achieving your desired look.

One of the key benefits of the inframammary incision is that it tends to be well-concealed within the natural breast fold, minimizing visible scarring. This makes it an attractive option for many patients who are concerned about the appearance of scars. However, individuals who are prone to scarring or have certain skin types may experience more noticeable scars, so it’s important to discuss this with your surgeon to set realistic expectations.

Another advantage of this method is that it typically results in a more straightforward surgical procedure and recovery process, as the surgeon has unobstructed access to the area. This can potentially lead to more predictable surgical outcomes and a smoother recovery.

While the inframammary approach offers many benefits, it’s not without its considerations. Some patients might find that the scar, although discreet, can still be a concern, especially if they have a history of poor scar healing. Discussing your skin type and any concerns about scarring with your surgeon can help in making an informed decision about whether this approach is the right choice for you.

• The inframammary incision is made in the crease under the breast, which offers the surgeon direct access to the breast tissue. This approach is particularly versatile and can accommodate a wide range of implant sizes and types. One of its key benefits is that it tends to result in a well-concealed scar, as it is hidden within the natural breast fold. However, individuals with certain skin types or those prone to scarring may find the scar more noticeable.
• The periareolar technique involves an incision around the edge of the areola, blending with the natural color transition of the nipple area. This method offers good access for precise implant placement but carries the risk of affecting nipple sensation or breastfeeding. Patients with smaller areolas might find this option particularly appealing due to its potential for minimal scarring.
• The transaxillary method places the incision in the armpit, thus avoiding scars on the breast itself. This technique requires specialized surgical skills and may not be suitable for all types of implants. It is particularly advantageous for those who prioritize scar placement away from the breast area.

Each of these incision types has its own set of pros and cons, and the right choice will depend on individual circumstances such as body type, skin quality, and aesthetic goals. Discussing these factors with your surgeon can help you make a more informed decision that aligns with your preferences and expectations.

Periareolar Technique

The periareolar technique involves making an incision around the edge of the areola, the darker area surrounding the nipple. This approach often appeals to those looking for minimal scarring, as the incision line can blend seamlessly with the natural color transition of the areola.

In terms of surgical access, the periareolar method allows for precise placement of the implant, which can help in achieving the desired breast shape and contour. However, it’s essential to weigh the potential risks. This technique may affect nipple sensation and could potentially impact breastfeeding in the future.

Patients with smaller areolas might find this technique particularly advantageous due to its potential for minimal visible scarring. As with any surgical option, individual factors such as skin quality and overall health can influence outcomes. It’s crucial to have a comprehensive discussion with your surgeon to evaluate whether this approach aligns with your aesthetic goals and lifestyle needs. This conversation will help you understand all potential risks and benefits, enabling you to make a well-informed decision tailored to your unique circumstances.

• The inframammary incision, positioned in the crease under the breast, offers direct access to the breast tissue, making it a versatile option that accommodates various implant sizes and types. It tends to be well-hidden within the natural breast fold, although individuals with certain skin types may experience more noticeable scarring.
• The periareolar technique involves an incision around the edge of the areola, blending with the natural color transition of the nipple area. This method provides good access for implant placement but carries the risk of affecting nipple sensation or breastfeeding. It’s particularly appealing to those with smaller areolas due to the potential for minimal scarring.
• The transaxillary method places the incision in the armpit, avoiding scars on the breast itself. This technique requires specialized surgical skills and may not be suitable for all types of implants. It is advantageous for those prioritizing scar placement away from the breast area.

Each incision type has its own set of pros and cons, and the best choice depends on individual circumstances such as body type, skin quality, and aesthetic goals. Discussing these factors with your surgeon can help you make a more informed decision that aligns with your preferences and expectations.

Transaxillary Method

The transaxillary method involves making an incision in the armpit to place the breast implant, avoiding any scars on the breast itself. This approach is particularly advantageous for individuals who prefer scar placement away from the breast area. The incision is concealed within the natural folds of the underarm, making it less noticeable.

One significant advantage of this method is that it maintains the aesthetics of the breast by keeping the scar hidden in the armpit. However, this technique requires specialized surgical skills and not all surgeons are proficient in this method. It also may not be compatible with all types of implants, particularly larger or more rigid ones.

Recovery and postoperative care for the transaxillary method can be slightly different compared to other techniques. Since the incision is in the armpit, there might be some discomfort when moving the arms or lifting objects in the initial recovery period. Patients are often advised to limit upper body movement to ensure proper healing.

During your consultation, your surgeon will evaluate factors such as your anatomy, implant choice, and personal preferences to determine if the transaxillary method is suitable for you. Understanding the specific requirements and potential challenges associated with this approach can help you make an informed decision that aligns with your aesthetic goals.